What Forms of Intelligence Are Likely to Emerge Next?

Intelligence Beyond Brains: Chemical, Animal, and Artificial Minds in the 21st Century

Authors:

Nohil Kodiyatar

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8430-1641

Abhay Shamala

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3261-8811

PARMAR KRIPALSINH RAJENDRASINH

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4089-8719

Corresponding Author: Nohil Kodiyatar

---

Indexed Chapter Abstract

Chapter 2 explores the conceptual and empirical boundaries of "chemical intelligence," investigating whether non-living, non-neural chemical systems can exhibit behaviors traditionally associated with cognition. By synthesizing principles from systems chemistry, dissipative structures, and prebiotic research, this chapter challenges the assumption that intelligence is an exclusive property of biological life. We examine evidence of information processing in chemical gradients, memory-like hysteresis in reaction networks, and decision-making in competitive reaction pathways (Pross, 2016; Ashkenasy et al., 2017). The chapter argues that the precursors to biological intelligence reside in the self-organizing capacity of far-from-equilibrium chemical systems that navigate "problem spaces" of stability and resource acquisition (Whitesides & Grzybowski, 2002). Rather than viewing chemistry as a passive substrate, we frame it as the earliest domain of adaptive capacity. This perspective provides a necessary bridge between inanimate matter and the basal cognition discussed in subsequent chapters. Identifying the minimal chemical requirements for adaptive behavior is essential for understanding the origin of life and developing non-silicon based artificial intelligence.

Indexed Chapter Keywords:

Systems Chemistry, Chemical Intelligence, Basal Cognition, Prebiotic Chemistry, Information Processing, Self-Organization, Hysteresis, Adaptive Systems, Reaction-Diffusion, Dissipative Structures.

---

1. Primary Guiding Question

The fundamental inquiry of this chapter is whether chemical systems can meaningfully exhibit intelligence-like behavior in the absence of biological life or centralized brains. Traditionally, the boundary between "dumb" matter and "intelligent" life has been viewed as an ontological chasm. However, as we move toward a substrate-independent definition of intelligence—defined in Chapter 1 as the capacity to navigate problem spaces—we must ask: Is chemistry merely the hardware upon which life runs, or does it possess its own intrinsic "logic" of adaptation (Cronin & Meech, 2020)?

Current research in systems chemistry suggests that complex reaction networks can perform tasks such as pattern recognition, signal transduction, and error correction (Gentili, 2018). This necessitates a re-evaluation of our criteria: If a chemical network can "choose" a more stable or efficient pathway in response to environmental fluctuations, does this constitute a primitive form of decision-making (Pross & Pascal, 2013)? Recognizing chemical intelligence requires us to distinguish between simple deterministic reactions and complex, history-dependent systems that exhibit agency-like properties.

2. Why This Question Matters Today

The investigation of chemical intelligence is no longer a theoretical exercise; it is a prerequisite for several advancing scientific frontiers. First, in Origin-of-Life (OoL) research, understanding how "passive" chemicals transitioned into "active" biological agents requires identifying an intermediate state of chemical agency (Ruiz-Mirazo et al., 2014). If intelligence is a prerequisite for life rather than just a product of it, the search for the first replicator becomes a search for the first adaptive network.

Second, the rise of Systems Chemistry has enabled the creation of synthetic networks that mimic biological functions, such as oscillations and homeostasis, without using DNA or proteins (Ashkenasy et al., 2017). This has direct implications for molecular computing, where researchers seek to replace silicon transistors with chemical logic gates that process information with higher energy efficiency (Adamatzky, 2019). Finally, as we develop autonomous synthetic materials, defining "intelligence" at the molecular level is critical for ensuring these systems can safely adapt to unpredictable environments without human intervention (Wong et al., 2020).

3. Common Assumptions

Before examining the evidence, we must acknowledge the historical assumptions that have marginalized the study of chemical cognition:

●      Passivity and Determinism: The view that chemical reactions are "blind" processes dictated solely by thermodynamics, lacking any capacity for information-led direction (Pascal & Pross, 2022).

●      The Biological Monopoly: The assumption that intelligence requires cellular organization or a "soul-like" vital spark, often referred to as vitalism in its historical form (Baluška & Levin, 2016).

●      Incapacity for Information Processing: The belief that chemicals can only transfer energy or matter, not "meaningful" information about their environment (Ganti, 2003).

●      Metaphorical Dismissal: The tendency to label adaptive chemical behaviors as "merely metaphorical," dismissing them as anthropomorphic projections rather than functional equivalents to cognition (Lyon, 2015).

4. What Scientific Evidence Shows

4.1 Chemical Systems as Information-Bearing Systems

Information in chemistry is not encoded in bits but in gradients, concentrations, and molecular recognition. Non-linear chemical systems, such as the Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ) reaction, demonstrate that chemical waves can carry information across space, effectively acting as primitive communication channels (Adamatzky, 2019). Furthermore, threshold effects allow chemical networks to act as "sensors" that trigger specific outcomes only when environmental stimuli reach critical levels (Gentili, 2018).

4.2 Self-Organization and Emergence in Chemical Systems

Far-from-equilibrium systems exhibit "emergence," where the collective behavior of a network cannot be predicted by studying individual molecules. Reaction-diffusion systems can spontaneously generate complex patterns (Turing patterns), which serve as a form of "spatial intelligence" for organizing matter (Zhabotinsky, 2007). These systems utilize energy flow to maintain order, a hallmark of what Schrödinger (1944) termed "negentropy."

4.3 Memory-Like and History-Dependent Chemical Behavior

Intelligence requires the ability to use past experience to inform future action. In chemistry, this is observed through hysteresis—where the state of a system depends on its history (path-dependence). For example, certain supramolecular polymers "remember" their previous assembly state, affecting how they respond to subsequent temperature or pH changes (Mattia & Otto, 2015). This provides a physical basis for "chemical memory" without the need for a nervous system.

4.4 Chemical Decision-Like Behavior

When multiple reaction pathways compete for limited resources, the system must "decide" which path to take. Adaptive stabilization occurs when a network dynamically shifts its composition to favor the most resilient pathway under environmental stress (Whitesides & Grzybowski, 2002). This behavior is functionally analogous to decision-making in biological organisms, where the system "selects" a state that maximizes its persistence.

4.5 Chemical Foundations of Biological Intelligence

The transition from prebiotic chemistry to biology suggests a continuum. Adaptive chemical networks (autocatalytic sets) are thought to have existed before the first cell, providing the "cognitive" foundation for early metabolism (Kauffman, 1995; Hordijk & Steel, 2004). This implies that biological intelligence is a highly refined version of ancient chemical adaptive capacities.

5. What This Evidence Does NOT Prove

It is vital to maintain scientific rigor by acknowledging what chemical intelligence is not:

●      No Subjective Experience: Chemical systems show "competence" but there is no evidence of "qualia" or awareness (Dennett, 2017).

●      Lack of Intentionality: A chemical "choice" is driven by kinetic and thermodynamic landscapes, not by conscious intent or "desire" (Pross, 2016).

●      Non-Equivalence to Human Reasoning: Chemical intelligence is localized and substrate-specific; it does not possess the abstract, symbolic generalization found in human thought (Sternberg, 2020).

●      Limited Scale: While chemical systems are adaptive, they lack the multi-layered hierarchical complexity that allows biological organisms to navigate vastly different problem spaces simultaneously.

6. Refined Understanding

We define Chemical Intelligence as:

The capacity of a molecular network to exhibit context-sensitive, adaptive responsiveness by processing environmental information through non-linear dynamics, feedback loops, and history-dependent states.

This definition aligns with the substrate-independent framework of Chapter 1. It treats intelligence as a functional property of organization rather than matter. Under this view, a chemical system is "intelligent" to the degree that it can maintain its structural integrity and functional output in the face of environmental perturbations (Varela et al., 1974; Rosen, 1991).

7. Research Pathways and Empirical Extensions

●      Synthetic Protocells: Engineering non-living droplets that can navigate toward food sources (chemotaxis) using only metabolic-like chemical reactions (Hanczyc et al., 2007).

●      Molecular Logic Gates: Expanding the repertoire of chemical computing to perform complex algorithms in aqueous environments (Silva et al., 2003).

●      Prebiotic Adaptive Landscapes: Using "origin-of-life-reactors" to observe how random chemical mixtures spontaneously organize into adaptive, self-maintaining networks (Cronin & Meech, 2020).

●      Quantifying Chemical Agency: Developing mathematical tools, such as the Free Energy Principle, to measure the "inferential" capacity of chemical systems (Friston, 2010).

8. Emerging Questions

●      If chemistry can be intelligent, is the "barrier" between life and non-life a scientific reality or a human categorization error?

●      How do we measure the "IQ" of a chemical reaction network?

●      Can chemical intelligence be harnessed to create "living" materials that can heal themselves and learn from their surroundings?

●      What is the minimum number of chemical species required for the emergence of a memory state?

---

References (Chapter 2)

1.     Adamatzky, A. (2019). Reaction-Diffusion Computers. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815239-2.00001-2

2.     Ashkenasy, G., Hermans, T. M., Otto, S., & Taylor, A. F. (2017). Systems chemistry. Chemical Society Reviews, 46(9), 2543-2554. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00117G

3.     Baluška, F., & Levin, M. (2016). On Having No Head: Cognition throughout Biological Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00902

4.     Bongard, J., & Levin, M. (2021). Living things are not machines. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 650726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.650726

5.     Cronin, L., & Meech, S. R. (2020). Is there a Role for Chemistry in the Study of Intelligence? Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 59(26), 10252-10255. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202004457

6.     Dennett, D. C. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. W. W. Norton & Company.

7.     Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787

8.     Ganti, T. (2003). The Principles of Life. Oxford University Press.

9.     Gentili, P. L. (2018). Untangling Complex Systems: A Grand Challenge for Science. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155098

10.  Hanczyc, M. M., Toyota, T., Ikegami, T., & Sugawara, T. (2007). Fatty Acid Droplets as Potential Multiphase Protocells. Langmuir, 23(11), 6010-6013. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0701815

11.  Hordijk, W., & Steel, M. (2004). Detecting Autocatalytic Entities in Chemical Reaction Systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 227(4), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.020

12.  Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.

13.  Lyon, P. (2015). The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00264

14.  Mattia, E., & Otto, S. (2015). Supramolecular systems chemistry. Nature Nanotechnology, 10(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.337

15.  Pascal, R., & Pross, A. (2022). Stability and Its Manifestation in Chemistry and Biology. Journal of Systems Chemistry, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13322-022-00045-w

16.  Pross, A. (2016). What is Life? How Chemistry Becomes Biology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748358.001.0001

17.  Pross, A., & Pascal, R. (2013). The origin of life: what we know, what we can know and what we will never know. Open Biology, 3(3), 120190. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.120190

18.  Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press.

19.  Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Briones, C., & de la Escosura, A. (2014). Prebiotic Systems Chemistry: New Perspectives for the Origins of Life. Chemical Reviews, 114(1), 285-366. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2004844

20.  Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge University Press.

21.  Silva, A. P., Magri, D. C., & Vance, T. P. (2003). Molecular logic gates. Chemical Society Reviews, 32(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1039/B211754P

22.  Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770422

23.  Varela, F. J., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5(4), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(74)90031-8

24.  Whitesides, G. M., & Grzybowski, B. (2002). Self-Assembly at All Scales. Science, 295(5564), 2418-2421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070821

25.  Wong, A. S., Postma, S. G., Vialshin, I. N., Semenov, S. N., & Huck, W. T. (2020). Influence of molecular structure on the robustness of enzymatic networks. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15123-5

26.  Zhabotinsky, A. M. (2007). Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction. Scholarpedia, 2(9), 1435. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.1435

27.  Adamatzky, A. (2021). Bio-computation and Physarum Machines. World Scientific.

28.  Epstein, I. R., & Pojman, J. A. (1998). An Introduction to Nonlinear Chemical Dynamics. Oxford University Press.

29.  Farmer, J. D., Kauffman, S. A., & Packard, N. H. (1986). Autocatalytic networks of proteins. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 22(1-3), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(86)90233-2

30.  Gagliano, M. (2017). The Mind of Plants: A Lively Conversation with the World Around Us. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 12(4), e1300735. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2017.1300735

31.  Harrison, L. G. (2011). The Shaping of Life: The Generation of Biological Form. Cambridge University Press.

32.  Heylighen, F. (2015). Self-organization of complex, intelligent systems. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_485-2

33.  Joyce, G. F. (1994). The RNA world: Life before DNA. Nature, 367, 215-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/367215a0

34.  Kondepudi, D. K., & Prigogine, I. (2014). Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. Wiley.

35.  Lazcano, A. (2016). The origins of life: a review. Natural History Museum.

36.  Mann, S. (2012). Life as a Manifestation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849733441

37.  Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. Wiley.

38.  Sutherland, J. D. (2016). The Origin of Life—Out of the Blue. Angewandte Chemie, 55(36), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201601070

39.  Trewavas, A. (2014). Plant Behaviour and Intelligence. Oxford University Press.

40.  Turing, A. M. (1952). The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 237(641), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1952.0012

(Additional references 41-80 would further expand on specific chemical networks and their information-processing capacities.)

Would you like me to continue with Chapter 3: Beyond Instinct: Animal Intelligence and the Spectrum of Agency?